Students who spent most of the 2020-21 school year in distance learning were more likely to fall behind academically and to be absent than students who spent most of the year on campus, according to a recently published Rand report.
A survey of teachers and principals found that schools that were primarily in distance learning last school year covered less curriculum, had more absenteeism and lower achievement in mathematics and English language arts.
Researchers found that schools that were fully remote during the 2020-21 school year tended to serve a higher percentage of students of color and students from low-income families.
Students who were taught remotely were absent and did not complete assignments twice as often as students who were taught on campuses full time, according to the teachers surveyed.
A third of the principals reported that they would continue to offer remote instruction to students who want it after the pandemic.
The final sentence of this article seems completely at odds with everything before it. Why would a third of principals choose to continue a model that has been shown to hurt students academically, socially, and emotionally — especially now that there is no longer a public health need for it? Whose interests are they actually serving?
Was thinking the same thing and I Agree 💯percent, Laura!!