Podcast | The case for local control over housing

Mill Valley, in Marin County. The affluent Northern California suburb has fiercely resisted state housing interventions. Photo by Frank Schulenburg via Wiki Commons.

Cities and homeowner groups — often reluctant to allow the building of denser housing in their backyards — are frequently blamed for California’s soaring housing costs.

But advocates for local control argue that state housing interventions, including many supported by Gov. Gavin Newsom, risk eroding the character of their neighborhoods. And they say that state efforts to prod more development ignore the strains on infrastructure and local budgets that will inevitably accompany new development. 

“There are yards and fences and gateways and flowers and trees that are showing a kind of love and appreciation for the intermingling between nature and beautiful construction and caring and neighborliness,” said Susan Kirsch, a slow-growth activist from Marin County, as she described her hometown of Mill Valley. 

“This is in contrast to the big-box apartments going up in so many places really without any sense of aesthetics or beauty or inviting quality.” 

On this episode of Gimme Shelter, the California Housing Crisis Podcast, Matt Levin of CalMatters and Liam Dillon of the Los Angeles Times discuss the case for local control over housing decisions with Kirsch and Juan Garza, mayor pro tem of the Southern California city of Bellflower.

Please subscribe to the Gimme Shelter podcast on Apple PodcastsStitcherSoundcloud, Google Play, Spotify or Overcast

Leave a Reply

The Exedra comments section is an essential part of the site. The goal of our comments policy is to help ensure it is a vibrant yet civil space. To participate, we ask that Exedra commenters please provide a first and last name. Please note that comments expressing congratulations or condolences may be published without full names. (View our full Comments Policy.)

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *