City surveying residents about public safety cameras

Piedmont police Chief Jeremy Bowers (right) talks about a city surveillance camera survey Thursday night with other members of the city's Public Safety Committee, including Jeffrey Horner (left)

The city is in the midst of a survey to help determine whether to expand a program to place public safety cameras at key local intersections, and they’re looking for as many Piedmont residents to respond as possible.

“We wanted to be straightforward (and) objective, and I think we’ve obtained that with what we have,” police Chief Jeremy Bowers told the city’s Public Safety Committee Thursday night.

The survey, now on the city’s website (, seeks responses about cost, privacy issues, who’s allowed to see the videos, length of time videos are retained, and other questions commonly accompanying the discussion of surveillance cameras.   

The survey is part of an ongoing public outreach concerning the surveillance cameras. The Committee held a public meeting in March dealing specifically with surveillance cameras, and there have been other public meetings focusing on specific blocks and neighborhoods.

City Councilwoman Jen Cavanaugh said Thursday night that privacy concerns and camera installation cost are two key factors being weighed in deciding whether to go ahead with the program. A key issue, she said, is whether Piedmont residents think the added safety is worth whatever loss of privacy the cameras may bring.

“I hope that, in the survey, we hear about the tradeoffs, and see how many folks have privacy concerns,” Cavanaugh said at the end of Thursday’s Public Safety Committee meeting. “It does send a message to people about who we’re videotaping, and ultimately we’re mostly videotaping ourselves.” 

The city has had a trial public safety camera installation — three cameras at Grand and Oakland Avenues at Piedmont’s main southern entrance — since 2012. The next cameras, if approved, are proposed for the intersections of Grand and Wildwood Avenues, Grand and Rose Avenues, Sunnyside and Olive Avenues, Trestle Glen Road and Cavanaugh Court, and Kingston and Monte Cresta Avenues. These locations could change based on various factors, the city says.

These public safety cameras are not the same as Piedmont’s automatic license plate reading cameras (ALPRs), which focus on recording vehicle license plates. Thirty-nine license plate reading cameras are stationed at 15 Piedmont intersections, and Bowers said again Thursday that these cameras have helped police solve dozens of local crimes.

The public safety cameras survey larger swaths of ground for whatever may happen within their view, and do not record license plates. 

The survey went live on Tuesday, Sept, 24, and Bowers said he expects it will remain active for about a month. Approximately 100 people had completed the survey as of Thursday night, he said, which he considers a strong response. He also said he hopes at least 5 percent of Piedmont’s 11,000 or so residents — 550 to 600 — take the survey.

“There’s no specific number … but the larger response, the better,” said Bowers, adding that he hopes a report on it can be presented to the City Council in November.

Added Committee Chair Lynne Wright, “The committee will not be making a formal recommendation, pro or con” as part of that November report to the council.

Other news from the Public Safety Committee meeting

Bowers told the Committee that Nicole Casalnuovo, his department’s newly named juvenile officer, has plunged into her new duties head first.

“She’s been busy; that’s a good thing, and that’s what we had hoped,” Bowers said of Casalnuovo, who was named in May to fill this new position.

A $391,599 California Department of Justice “tobacco grant” will pay for the juvenile officer position for two years. 

After a spirited community debate as to what sort of officer the community wants — a debate that ultimately saw rejection of a more common “school resource officer” position — Casalnuovo will work with the Piedmont Unified School District to conduct student and parent education classes on the harmfulness of tobacco use and develop a diversion program for youth who are detected using tobacco products.

That diversion program is still in the works, Bowers said Thursday.

Reach Sam Richards at

Leave a Reply

The Exedra comments section is an essential part of the site. The goal of our comments policy is to help ensure it is a vibrant yet civil space. To participate, we ask that Exedra commenters please provide a first and last name. Please note that comments expressing congratulations or condolences may be published without full names. (View our full Comments Policy.)

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *